Simulate popular betting systems and see their real performance
Simulate thousands of sessions to see true outcomesConfigure your betting system test
Compare different approaches
Monte Carlo simulation with 1,000 iterations
Your initial capital
Your expected advantage
Percentage of bankroll per bet
Total bets to simulate
The truth about betting systems
No betting system can overcome the house edge. Martingale doubles bets after losses - it wins small often but risks catastrophic loss. With a $10 base bet, after 7 losses you're betting $1,280 to win $10. The house edge applies to every bet regardless of system. Simulations show all systems converge to expected loss over time.
What the math tells us
Common questions about betting systems
Systems like Martingale win most sessions because small wins are common. But the math catches up: rare catastrophic losses wipe out many small wins. Over thousands of sessions, total losses equal (house edge × total wagered). No system changes this.
Martingale doubles your bet after each loss. Starting at $10: if you lose 3 times then win, you bet $10, $20, $40, $80 and win $80. You've bet $150 total to win $10 net. A 10-loss streak (not rare) would require $10,240 on a single bet.
None is "best" because all have identical long-term expectation. Flat betting is simplest and has lowest variance. If you insist on a system, Paroli (positive progression) limits losses while still allowing some upside. But mathematically, all lose at the same rate.
Simulations actually prove systems DON'T work. Run 100,000 sessions with any system and total profit/loss will approach (house edge × total wagered). Short simulations might show profit, but that's variance - like flipping heads 7 times in 10 flips.